These 19th-century collectors preserved a dying form of intimacy. A signature could be signed remotely for the first time. A cousin of the telegraph, this device was described by the Savannah Tribune as a 1,000-mile-long pen, beginning in Boston and ending in Chicago, with the consequence that ‘a man’s presence is no longer necessary in a place to affix his autograph’. During the following three years, both the telephone and phonograph arrived on the scene, allowing one’s voice to reach far beyond the body, a quality previously reserved for written words. The phrase ‘autograph fiend’ proliferates shortly after the introduction of commercial typewriters in 1874. This was an era of new media technologies as well, which threatened the primacy of handwriting as a means for communication at a distance. In 1878 he updated his influential book Criminal Man to include a section on handwriting, claiming that graphology not only reveals a person’s guilt over past actions, but also the probability they will commit future crimes. ‘An inspection of the autograph gave decided evidence of nervousness in its formation, the “C” especially being much elongated and the curve lines irregular.’ The criminologist Cesare Lombroso took this equation even further. Garfield in 1881, there was a flurry of discussion about his penmanship. This is also the period in which handwriting gained a newfound aura thanks to the popularity of chirography and graphology: pseudoscientific attempts to find correspondence between a person’s moral character and the shape of their scribbled characters. It coincided, for instance, with the rise of transatlantic celebrity, the formalisation of signed cheques as a monetary instrument and an emerging market for the resale of signatures. Several arguments can be made in tandem for why autographomania arrived when it did. Only toward the end of the 19th century did the pastime turn pathological, when larger cultural and commercial forces vitalised what we now call autographs. Bear in mind that ‘autograph’ in this context stands for any sample of handwriting, not solely the signature.
![autograph collecting autograph collecting](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/31bSTuPSumL.jpg)
Collecting in the US began in earnest during the 1810s, while 16th-century German students gathered specimens in dedicated autograph books. While it reached a fever pitch during the fin de siècle, autograph collecting is a much older tradition. Wilde’s hair surrogate went bald at an early age. The autographer supposedly developed a condition akin to carpal tunnel syndrome.
![autograph collecting autograph collecting](https://graphology-world.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Ben_Chandler_signing_autographs-e1407319146425.jpg)
And, amid characteristically pithy correspondence, Oscar Wilde recounts how he employed three secretaries while travelling a similar route in the 1880s: one to receive flowers another to sign autographs and a final unshorn attendant to clip trimmings from his locks – something the writer’s fanbase desired. The English social reformer Laura Ormiston Chant received 1,307 autograph requests during her four-month tour through the US in 1890. One account, in an 1887 issue of the Leicester Chronicle, finds a fiend from Chicago impersonating a courier in order to penetrate the House of Commons, stuffing the members’ name cards into his pocket on the fly. ‘The autograph fiend’ was often portrayed as originating in the US. Those afflicted with signatures were a recognised type. Wodehouse wrote a tale for Punch about a man who ‘passed safely through a sharp attack of Philatelism’, or, stamp collecting, only to fall prey to ‘a rather nasty bout of Autographomania’. One person’s quaint pastime is another’s consuming infatuation. That both should employ the language of illness reveals what was at stake. Within months of Joline’s meditations, British illustrator Harry Furniss asked a question in the Strand Magazine: ‘Is there any inoculation possible to avert autograph fever?’ Another collector replied: ‘autograph fever clutches all sorts and conditions of men in its deadly grip’. Dwight diagnosed as ‘autographomania’: a collective obsession, which intensified in Britain and the US during the 1880s and 1890s, with the handwriting of both notable individuals and intimate familiars. He was not speaking of corgis and calicos, but of handwritten artefacts: ‘I look down upon them almost as one might upon children whom he must leave behind.’ Joline was one of many collectors suffering from what the 19th-century librarian Theodore F. Joline at the conclusion of his Meditations of an Autograph Collector (1902).
![autograph collecting autograph collecting](https://images.collectors.com/articles/collecting-sports-autographs1.jpg)
‘No one will ever be as fond of my pets as I have been’, lamented the American lawyer Adrian H.